Accelerating AI Literacy

---

Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant future technology for British schools - it is already shaping how young people learn, communicate, and navigate information. Yet while students are adopting AI tools at pace, the education system is still working out what AI literacy should mean, how it should be taught, and what risks and opportunities it brings. Recent research from the British Council, the National Literacy Trust, and emerging academic frameworks paints a picture of a sector in transition: enthusiastic, uneven, and urgently in need of coherent strategy.

Young people are already using AI - but not always critically

The National Literacy Trust’s 2025 Annual Literacy Survey shows that two‑thirds of UK teenagers (66.5%) use generative AI, with nearly half using it weekly or more often. Their most common uses are:

• Asking questions (61.2%).
• Homework help (60.9%).
• Entertainment (52.8%).
• Vocabulary improvement (39.5%).
• Creative writing support (20.7%).

This paints a clear picture: AI is already embedded in young people’s literacy practices, especially writing. But the same research highlights a critical tension. While 48.9% of young people say they add their own thoughts to AI outputs, 25.1% admit to “just copying” AI responses for homework, up from 20.9% the previous year.

This is the heart of the AI literacy challenge: students are using AI, but not always with the critical awareness needed to evaluate accuracy, bias, or appropriateness.

Teachers are engaged - but need support and clear frameworks

The British Council’s review of AI in English language teaching found that AI tools are already being used to support speaking, writing, and reading skills, and to help learners practise outside the classroom. Teachers report benefits such as:

• Reduced fear of speaking.
• More personalised practice.
• Support for goal‑setting and self‑management.

But the same research highlights persistent barriers:

• Traditional lecture‑style teaching remains common.
• AI tools often fail or behave unpredictably.
• Biases in AI models can reinforce narrow ideas of “appropriate” language.
• Teachers lack confidence in AI literacy themselves.
• Clear rules on data privacy and ethics are missing.

In other words: teachers see the potential, but they are navigating it without a map.

What AI literacy should mean in British classrooms

A 2025 narrative review of AI literacy research proposes that AI literacy must be holistic, combining technical understanding with ethical, social, and contextual awareness. The ED‑AI Lit framework, for example, identifies six core components:

• Knowledge - understanding what AI is and how it works.
• Evaluation - assessing outputs critically.
• Collaboration - working with AI as a tool, not a crutch.
• Contextualisation - understanding where AI fits in society.
• Autonomy - using AI without over‑reliance.
• Ethics - recognising risks, bias, and responsible use.

This aligns closely with what British teachers say they need: not just tools, but principles.

The emerging gap: AI use vs AI understanding

Across the research, a consistent pattern emerges:

• Students engage in heavy use of AI for writing, homework, and questions - but they are missing out on critical evaluation, understanding of limitations, ethical awareness.
• Teachers are using AI for language practice and admin tasks - but they are not gaining training, confidence, or guidance on safe and effective use.
• Schools are experimenting with tools - but they are not developing coherent frameworks, policies, or curriculum integration.
• System leaders are beginning to discuss AI strategy - but they do not have sufficient input into national standards, assessment models, and teacher CPD pathways.

The result is a widening gap between AI use and AI understanding - a gap that AI literacy education must close.

Why AI literacy matters now

AI literacy is not simply a technical skill. It is a civic competency, a workforce requirement, and a safeguarding issue. Here's why:

1. Preparing students for an AI‑driven economy

AI is reshaping sectors from healthcare to finance. Students need to understand not just how to use AI tools, but how AI systems shape decisions, automate tasks, and influence opportunities.

2. Protecting students from misinformation and bias

With 42.8% of young people saying they check AI outputs because they “could be wrong”, there is clear awareness - but not universal. AI literacy must teach students to interrogate outputs, not accept them.

3. Supporting ethical and responsible use

From data privacy to algorithmic bias, students need to understand the social and ethical implications of AI - not just its convenience.

4. Empowering teachers

Teachers need structured CPD, model policies, and practical frameworks to integrate AI safely and effectively.

What British classrooms need next

Based on the research, three priorities stand out:

1. A national AI literacy framework

The UK currently lacks a unified definition of AI literacy. A national framework - aligned with ED‑AI Lit and adapted for British curricula - would give schools clarity.

2. Teacher‑first professional development

Teachers cannot teach what they have not been trained to understand. CPD must cover:

• - AI fundamentals.
• - Critical evaluation.
• - Classroom applications.
• - Ethics and safeguarding.
• - Subject‑specific use cases.

3. Curriculum integration, not add‑on activities

AI literacy should be woven into:

• - English (critical reading of AI‑generated texts).
• - Computing (model behaviour, data, algorithms).
• - Citizenship (ethics, rights, societal impact).
• - Careers education (AI in the workplace).

This is not a new subject - it is a new lens.

AI literacy as a core competency

British classrooms are already full of AI - in students’ pockets, in teachers’ workflows, and in the wider digital ecosystem. The question is no longer whether AI belongs in education, but whether the education system can equip young people to use it wisely, critically, and ethically.

The research is clear: AI literacy must become a core competency, not a niche enrichment activity. With coherent frameworks, teacher‑led implementation, and a focus on critical thinking, British schools can turn AI from a source of uncertainty into a tool for empowerment.